Surgical and Functional Outcomes After Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Decompression via Supraclavicular Approach: A 10-Year Single Centre Experience

Jakub Kaczynski, Louis Fligelstone

Abstract


Background: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) results from compression of the neurovascular structures in the region of thoracic outlet. Treatment depends on the variant (venous, arterial, neurological or any combination of these), severity of symptoms and response to the conservative management. The aim was to assess surgical and functional outcomes after surgical decompression using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

Methods: A retrospective review of all TOS cases operated in our department between 2002 and 2012. Collected data provided information on patients demographics, TOS type, operative findings, complications and follow-up. The pre and post operative DASH questionnaire scores were recorded.

Results: Forty four patients (88%) completed pre and post operative DASH questionnaire. Mean age was 42 10.78 years (range 16 - 60) and 37 were women. Twenty seven patients had the combination of neurological and vascular symptoms. The reminder of patients presented with venous TOS (vTOS, n = 5), arterial TOS (aTOS, n = 7) and 3 cases with venous-arterial TOS. There were 40 elective and 4 emergency operations. All operations were performed under the general anaesthesia and via supraclavicular approach. Decompressive procedures consisted of an excision of the cervical (n = 11) or first rib (n = 23), combined cervical and first rib excision (n = 10), scalenectomy (n = 42) and division of soft tissue (n = 24). Post operative complications included wound infection (n = 1), phrenic nerve traction injury (n = 2) and pleural entries (n = 12). There were no brachial plexus or vascular injuries. Mean follow up was 11.7 15.4 months. Mean DASH questionnaire scores improved post operatively across all TOS groups. When DASH scores were analysed according to the TOS type, the most marked post operative improvement was noted in aTOS with mean delta change of 36.99 22.72, followed by vTOS (26.22 16.89) and nTOS (18.64 21.07). These findings were statistically significant with P < 0.05. Thirty nine (78%) patients reported the return of upper limb function. Only 5 patients (nTOS) reported worsening of the limb function.

Conclusions: Careful selection of patients with meticulous surgical technique can produce excellent surgical and functional outcomes in all TOS types.




doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jcs152w


Keywords


Thoracic outlet syndrome; Supraclavicular approach; DASH; Surgical outcomes

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Current Surgery, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1298 (print), 1927-1301 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.currentsurgery.org   editorial contact: editor@currentsurgery.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.