Surgical Management of Simple Liver Cysts: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience

Oludolapo Sotade, Omar Mouline, Carlo Pulitano, Michael Crawford, David Joseph, James Gallagher, Charbel Sandroussi

Abstract


Background: Due to the limited data comparing treatment outcomes of simple liver cysts (SLCs), there is, at present, no consensus on the optimum surgical treatment method for symptomatic SLCs. The objective of this paper was to review the outcomes for surgically managed SLCs carried out at our institution.

Methods: A database search was performed to identify all patients who, between January 2003 and December 2012, underwent surgical intervention with a preoperative diagnosis of symptomatic SLCs at our institution. Retrospective analysis of patient demographics, symptoms, cyst characteristics including number, size, location and imaging features, operative management, postoperative morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, final histopathological diagnosis and long-term outcomes were performed.

Results: Between January 2003 and December 2012, 28 patients underwent surgical intervention for symptomatic SLCs at our institution. Twenty-four were female (85.7%) and four were male (14.3%), with a mean age of 58 years. Laparoscopic fenestration was performed in 11 patients (39.3%), open fenestration in four (14.3%), laparoscopic resection in six (21.4%) and open resection in seven (25%). The mean cyst diameter was 8.97 5.11 cm. Operative mortality was 3.6% (n = 1). Complications developed in two patients (7.2%), including pleural effusion (n = 1) and perihepatic abscess (n = 1). The final histopathology demonstrated an SLC in 23 patients (82.1%), cystadenoma in four (14.3%) and cystadenocarcinoma in one patient (3.6%). Length of hospital stay was 2.38 2.06 days for the laparoscopic group and 7 3.12 days for the open surgery group. Two patients (7.14%) experienced asymptomatic recurrence of cyst. The mean length of follow-up was 25.1 months (range 12 - 104.1) and the overall survival rate at 1 year was 96.4%.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic fenestration is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic SLCs. Open fenestration should be considered for large cysts, cysts presenting difficult laparoscopic access, and cysts with atypical features. Atypical features should prompt intraoperative frozen section and, if necessary, liver resection.




J Curr Surg. 2015;5(1):129-132
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcs263w


Keywords


Simple liver cyst; Fenestration; Resection

Full Text: HTML PDF
 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Current Surgery, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1298 (print), 1927-1301 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.currentsurgery.org   editorial contact: editor@currentsurgery.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.